The panel
The team behind this objection
An evidence led case. Each specialist below has examined a different part of this application, and each finding is theirs, not ours.
17
specialists instructed
13
areas of expertise
1
planning application
US
Una Somerville
Planning consultant
Planning
Somerville Consulting
Right facility, wrong location: contrary to planning policy with no best practice site search, and four major schemes within 2.5 km that should be assessed together.
AR
Andrew Ryan
Solicitor
Legal and counsel
TLT LLP
The Council’s environmental screening is open to challenge. NI Water says there is no wastewater capacity, and the precautionary principle requires a full assessment.
WO
William Orbison
KC
Legal and counsel
Senior Counsel
Senior counsel on the challenge to the Council’s determination under the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations.
CF
Conor Fegan
BL
Legal and counsel
The Bar of Northern Ireland
Counsel on the challenge to the Council’s determination under the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations.
GS
Gail Stoten
Heritage consultant
Heritage
Pegasus
The impact on the setting of nearby listed buildings and on archaeology is not properly assessed, and the screening does not adequately address the setting of the Merchant’s Linen House.
DS
Dawson Stelfox
Conservation architect
Heritage adviser
Consarc
Conservation architect advising on new build within the setting of a Grade A listed castle.
CM
Clive Mellon
Ecologist
Ecology
Allen and Mellon Environmental Ltd
Eight confirmed bat roosts, a European protected species, and a floodlit scheme that may be impossible to licence. Breeding newts, badger and otter are present on site.
NS
Noel Sweeney
Landscape architect
Landscape
Spaces for Nature
The visual assessment is deficient, with solar glint and glare excluded and no residential visual amenity assessment. 560 metres of priority hedgerow would be lost.
TC
Tim Cousins
Traffic engineer
Traffic and drainage
Lisbane
Only a 500 spectator event was modelled, not the 2,100 seats proposed for special events. The Galgorm roundabout is already over capacity, with no footway, cycleway or bus route.
DC
David Calvert
Roads engineer
Traffic and drainage
Elliott Calvert
About 60,000 m³ of cut and 120,000 m³ of fill to reshape the land. The required visibility splays cannot be achieved, and part of the site lies in a floodplain.
KE
Kenny Elliott
Roads engineer
Traffic and drainage
Elliott Calvert
Testing the applicant’s roads and drainage modelling, and the earthworks needed to reshape the site.
ML
Dr Martin Lester
Acoustician
Acoustics
Lester Acoustics
The true rural baseline is about 42 decibels. A large event reaches about 59, roughly 17 above baseline, a significant adverse impact the applicant understated.
KA
Kerem Asfuroglu
Lighting designer
Lighting
Dark Source
A genuinely dark sky, not the baseline claimed. 30 metre masts and 800 lux lighting would spill onto neighbouring homes.
IM
Isobel Marshall
Environmental consultant
Contamination
Arthian
The contamination risk assessment is deficient, and significant effects cannot be ruled out.
AW
Andrew Webb
Economist
Economics
OCO Global
Independently testing the applicant’s usage, demand and economic benefit claims.
GW
Guy Wickett
Sports facility specialist
Sports project management
Entodo
Reviewing the operational and business case: whether the programme, usage and management stack up on this site.
RC
Ryan Colton
Architect
Architecture
Archion Design Ltd
Advising on the design, scale and massing of the proposed buildings in this rural setting.
Findings are summarised from the community update presentation of 13 August 2026. Full reports accompany the objection.
Read what the panel found
The full community update presentation sets out each finding in the panel’s own words.