The panel

The team behind this objection

An evidence led case. Each specialist below has examined a different part of this application, and each finding is theirs, not ours.

17

specialists instructed

13

areas of expertise

1

planning application

US

Una Somerville

Planning consultant

Planning

Somerville Consulting

Right facility, wrong location: contrary to planning policy with no best practice site search, and four major schemes within 2.5 km that should be assessed together.

AR

Andrew Ryan

Solicitor

Legal and counsel

TLT LLP

The Council’s environmental screening is open to challenge. NI Water says there is no wastewater capacity, and the precautionary principle requires a full assessment.

WO

William Orbison

KC

Legal and counsel

Senior Counsel

Senior counsel on the challenge to the Council’s determination under the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations.

CF

Conor Fegan

BL

Legal and counsel

The Bar of Northern Ireland

Counsel on the challenge to the Council’s determination under the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations.

GS

Gail Stoten

Heritage consultant

Heritage

Pegasus

The impact on the setting of nearby listed buildings and on archaeology is not properly assessed, and the screening does not adequately address the setting of the Merchant’s Linen House.

DS

Dawson Stelfox

Conservation architect

Heritage adviser

Consarc

Conservation architect advising on new build within the setting of a Grade A listed castle.

CM

Clive Mellon

Ecologist

Ecology

Allen and Mellon Environmental Ltd

Eight confirmed bat roosts, a European protected species, and a floodlit scheme that may be impossible to licence. Breeding newts, badger and otter are present on site.

NS

Noel Sweeney

Landscape architect

Landscape

Spaces for Nature

The visual assessment is deficient, with solar glint and glare excluded and no residential visual amenity assessment. 560 metres of priority hedgerow would be lost.

TC

Tim Cousins

Traffic engineer

Traffic and drainage

Lisbane

Only a 500 spectator event was modelled, not the 2,100 seats proposed for special events. The Galgorm roundabout is already over capacity, with no footway, cycleway or bus route.

DC

David Calvert

Roads engineer

Traffic and drainage

Elliott Calvert

About 60,000 m³ of cut and 120,000 m³ of fill to reshape the land. The required visibility splays cannot be achieved, and part of the site lies in a floodplain.

KE

Kenny Elliott

Roads engineer

Traffic and drainage

Elliott Calvert

Testing the applicant’s roads and drainage modelling, and the earthworks needed to reshape the site.

ML

Dr Martin Lester

Acoustician

Acoustics

Lester Acoustics

The true rural baseline is about 42 decibels. A large event reaches about 59, roughly 17 above baseline, a significant adverse impact the applicant understated.

KA

Kerem Asfuroglu

Lighting designer

Lighting

Dark Source

A genuinely dark sky, not the baseline claimed. 30 metre masts and 800 lux lighting would spill onto neighbouring homes.

IM

Isobel Marshall

Environmental consultant

Contamination

Arthian

The contamination risk assessment is deficient, and significant effects cannot be ruled out.

AW

Andrew Webb

Economist

Economics

OCO Global

Independently testing the applicant’s usage, demand and economic benefit claims.

GW

Guy Wickett

Sports facility specialist

Sports project management

Entodo

Reviewing the operational and business case: whether the programme, usage and management stack up on this site.

RC

Ryan Colton

Architect

Architecture

Archion Design Ltd

Advising on the design, scale and massing of the proposed buildings in this rural setting.

Findings are summarised from the community update presentation of 13 August 2026. Full reports accompany the objection.

Read what the panel found

The full community update presentation sets out each finding in the panel’s own words.

Planning Reference:

Application Reference: LA02/2026/0169/F — Lands to the north, south, east and west of 125 Fenaghy Road